One woman’s storey of woe especially comes to mind. We name her storey “The Tale of the Nine-Year Divorce.” around the office. She had hired an attorney here in Virginia to defend a divorce action and counter divorce litigation. At the time, she was living out of state and paid the solicitor an important retainer. Have a look at McKennon Law Group PC – Newport Beach ERISA Benefits Attorney for more info on this. No formal contract existed. It seemed like the prosecutor she had selected hated the opposing attorney and did little to move the case forward. In fact, the lawyer allowed the case to be dismissed for inaction from the court docket.
In this basis, cases are not dismissed without advance notice to the attorney of record. The lawyer did not disclose the potential dismissal to his client. It was not until she was informed of the dismissal by the court that she learned what had happened. The client was in a car accident, which caused her to be hospitalised and undergo several operations. She trusted her counsel to look out for her interests; she did not know or understand what was going to happen and had no idea that the case had been dismissed until she got notice from the court.
He got the lawsuit reopened after the client approached the prosecutor. It was not until the opposing counsel withdrew from the case, however that the lawyer acted to bring his client’s interests forward. Meanwhile, with the bulk of the marital properties, the lawyer allowed the woman’s husband to abscond, escaping the court’s jurisdiction. The prosecutor got a spousal support order, but did not do anything useful in collecting or implementing the spousal support order against the defendant who did not pay.
The lawyer actually allowed the accumulation of tens of thousands of dollars in arrears. The prosecutor, meanwhile, applied for and obtained a court payment of $10,000 from the absconded husband for attorney’s fees. When the lawyer learned that the husband had invested the money and it would not be easy to obtain the attorney fee reward, he started to demand money from the consumer. She was unable to pay the counsel, having been disabled and not having received a penny of the welfare grant, and he withdrew from her case at the final hearing. Needless to say, when it comes to lawyers, all this left the woman with a bad taste in her mouth.