What are termed pesticides are the chemicals used in this endeavour. And while pesticides are usually very effective in pest control, the downside to them tends to arise when we consider the fact that they tend to be extremely unfriendly in terms of the environment. At this point, it is worth keeping in mind that the chemicals known as pesticides tend to be very potent ones. So, even after the pests are gone, it often happens that traces of them remain where they were used. These traces are eventually washed down to the bodies of water where they wreck great damage to the (non-pest) plants and animals residing in the bodies of water.Interested readers can find more information about them at Jersey City Pest Control
This environmental impact of chemical pest control, which led to questions as to whether a more environmentally friendly method for controlling pests could not be developed, is a concern. The end result was to explore alternatives such as biological pest control, which we are trying to see if it is really the answer to concerns about (chemical) pest control.
In biological pest-control, other organisms are known to be predators of those considered to be pests that are unleashed on the said pests; eating them up and thus solving the problem of pests. Thus, if the troubled pests are aphids, the other organisms known to feed on aphids are introduced into the field where the problem lies, to feed on the aphids instead of spraying an environmentally unfriendly chemical.
However, the problem with biological pest-control is that it tends to be of doubtful efficacy. While chemical pest control tends to be thorough, leaving no pests or even traces of them in the control of biological pests, that cannot be guaranteed altogether. It can also prove to be a herculean task to implement biological pest control on a large-scale basis (for example on a thousand-hectare plantation). Ultimately, it’s such considerations that make us continue to think about more environmentally friendly approaches to pest control. This is because, while it is definitely an approach that addresses the environmental concerns raised about the control of chemical pests, it does not appear to be sufficiently efficient (or scalable) in the view of most people.